Land on one line. Expand to the network.

Priced per line, per factory and on outcomes — so the first workflow funds the next. No per-seat pricing; a plant should not pay more for letting more people see the truth.

  • Annual prepay 15–20% off
  • Outcome components available
  • No per-seat fees

Three ways to buy

Most plants start at Line on the workflow that hurts most, then move to Factory within two quarters.

Line

Manufacturers validating ROI on one wedge workflow.

$8,000/line/month

  • One workflow: cut and nest, stitch and last, or mould and bond
  • Factory-edge inference runtime for that line
  • Defect, fit and yield dashboards
  • Audit log and MES write-back
  • Standard support, 8×5
Start on one line

Enterprise

Brands and contract-manufacturer networks standardising on Footeon.

Customland $350k–$4M ACV

  • Multi-site rollout and fleet management
  • Custom material, last and bond model families
  • On-prem or VPC deployment, no telemetry egress
  • SSO, RBAC, spend and autonomy policy controls
  • SLAs, named CSE and quarterly model reviews
Contact enterprise

Prices exclude edge hardware, which you can buy directly from the OEM or through us at cost.

One Line subscription = this run, on repeat

Line pricing covers one workflow end to end on one line. RUN-4417 is what that looks like in practice: 1,200 pairs, eight steps, one approval, logged and costed per lot.

  1. 01 twin.simulate_run SUCCEEDED 2m 40s

    Simulated the whole lot in the shoe-and-line twin before a single hide was cut — nest layout, mould recipe and bonding process window for EVA midsole and rubber outsole at 71% relative humidity.

    inputs · outputs

    in: pattern velo-trainer-2, hide batch LH-2291, mould set M-14 · out: nest v7, recipe R-08, bond window 62–68 °C

  2. 02 cut.nest_optimize SUCCEEDED 4m 12s

    Scanned 64 hides, marked 1,842 scars and brand marks, then solved a defect-aware nest across the EU 36–46 size curve. Leather yield came in at 87.4% against a 79.1% plant baseline.

    inputs · outputs

    in: 64 hides, 1,842 defects · out: yield 87.4%, 12.3 s solve, 22 nested part groups

  3. 03 stitch.tension_control SUCCEEDED 11m 08s

    Held stitch tension inside ±4% across 14 stitching stations, caught three skipped stitches on the lateral overlay and re-ran those uppers before they reached lasting.

    inputs · outputs

    in: seam map v3, thread lot TL-77 · out: 3 skips corrected, 0 escapes

  4. 04 mold.density_control SUCCEEDED 9m 51s

    Trimmed press temperature and dwell on P-3 as the EVA lot ran slightly high in blowing agent, holding midsole density at 0.24 g/cm³ within ±1.8% and cure at 214 seconds.

    inputs · outputs

    in: EVA lot EV-1180, recipe R-08 · out: density 0.24 g/cm³, cure 214 s

  5. 05 last.fit_control SUCCEEDED 6m 33s

    Lasted the upper over last set L-42 under a heat and tension profile tuned to this leather lot. Toe-lasting deviation held at 0.6 mm; heel seat measured true on every pair sampled.

    inputs · outputs

    in: last set L-42, 78 °C, profile T-2 · out: deviation 0.6 mm

  6. 06 bond.window_control APPROVAL 3m 04s

    Humidity climbed to 71% mid-shift, pushing the primer flash-off outside the validated window. The agent proposed +2 °C activation and +0.3 bar press pressure, and paused for the quality engineer to approve — the change touches a validated bonding parameter.

    inputs · outputs

    in: primer PR-9, adhesive AD-22, RH 71% · out: proposed activation 66 °C, awaiting sign-off

  7. 07 quality.inspect SUCCEEDED 5m 47s

    Bond-line vision, 3D fit metrology and cosmetic scan on every pair. First-pass yield 98.2%; 21 pairs routed to rework for adhesive squeeze-out, none for bond gaps.

    inputs · outputs

    in: 1,200 pairs · out: FPY 98.2%, 21 rework, 0 bond-gap escapes

  8. 08 robot.finish_pack SUCCEEDED 18m 22s

    Robotic cleaning, lacing, insole insertion and carton packing to spec C-4, with per-pair traceability written back to the MES and the brand’s quality portal.

    inputs · outputs

    in: carton spec C-4 · out: 1,179 pairs packed, 21 held

Unit economics of one lot

Lot
1,200 pairs · EU 36–46
Runs per line per month
≈ 420 lots [Illustrative]
Line subscription
$8,000 / line / month
Leather saved per lot
8.3 pts of yield

Figures are modelled from the RUN-4417 scenario, not a customer average. Your line assessment produces the real numbers.

What is in each plan

The difference is scope of the loop, not throttled capability.

Plan comparison across agents, twin, deployment and support
CapabilityLineFactoryEnterprise
Agents includedOne workflowAll eightAll eight, multi-site
Shoe-and-line twin—IncludedIncluded, custom physics
Defect and fit sensingThat lineWhole plantWhole network
Custom material and bond models—Standard familiesCustom per material and last
DeploymentEdge + cloudEdge + cloudEdge, VPC or full on-prem
IdentityEmail + MFASSOSSO + SCIM + RBAC
Audit exportCSVSigned exportSigned export to GRC
Support8×524×524×7 with named CSE
Model review cadenceAnnualSemi-annualQuarterly

Put part of the price on the result

For the highest-value workflows we will price a component against the outcome, measured on your baseline.

Leather yield

A share of verified yield improvement above the agreed baseline, measured per hide and audited monthly.

Warranty returns

Priced against reduction in delamination and bond-related returns over a rolling twelve months.

Rework and scrap

Priced against first-pass yield improvement and reduction in rework hours.

From assessment to contract

No procurement theatre. Four steps, roughly ten weeks.

  1. Assessment

    Two-week baseline on one line, at no charge, producing a measured yield, defect and changeover picture.

    free

  2. Paid pilot

    One workflow, one line, a defined success metric and a fixed pilot fee credited against the first year.

    weeks 3–10

  3. Line contract

    Annual agreement on the wedge workflow with prepay discount and outcome component if desired.

    $8,000/line/mo

  4. Expand

    Second workflow, whole factory, then network rollout under an enterprise agreement.

    $55,000/mo and up

What a single line typically returns

Modelled on a plant running 4,000 pairs a day on leather uppers with cemented construction.

  • $1.9M annual leather saved at +8.3 points of yield [modelled]
  • $640k annual warranty and rework avoided [modelled]
  • 96k annual cost of the Line plan, in US dollars
  • 2 quarters to typical payback

Modelled figures use published footwear cost benchmarks and design-partner baselines. Your assessment produces your numbers. [PLACEHOLDER] pending audited case studies.

Things we refuse to meter

Metering the wrong thing changes plant behaviour for the worse.

We do not charge per user, per inspected pair, per model retrain or per dashboard. Charging per pair inspected pushes plants back toward sampling; charging per seat keeps the quality team from seeing the run. The price is the line and the factory.

  • No per-seat licences
  • No per-inspection fees
  • No charge for retraining on your own data
  • No paywalled audit log

Included at every tier

  • Unlimited users and viewers
  • Every pair inspected, not sampled
  • Full audit log and export
  • Model retraining on your plant data
  • Connector updates and edge OTA
  • Security reviews and questionnaires

The fine print, in plain language

Discounts and terms

  • Annual prepay: 15–20% discount
  • Multi-year agreements with usage ramps
  • Floor pricing protected; discounts traded for term length and a public case study
  • Pilot fees credited against year one

Expansion

  • Add lines at the Line rate until Factory is cheaper
  • Factory converts automatically at the crossover point
  • Enterprise pricing from $350k ACV
  • Outcome components negotiated per workflow

What buyers say the money bought

The three outcomes that justify the line item.

“The nesting agent found yield our best pattern cutter could not — and then explained the layout hide by hide. We stopped arguing about scrap and started managing it.”
Head of Cutting Operations · Andean Footwear Co. [Illustrative]

Leather yield 79.1% → 87.4%

“Bonding is where our warranty costs live. Having an agent watch humidity, primer flash-off and press pressure on every pair — and stop for a human when it wants to move a validated parameter — is the first thing that has actually moved delamination.”
Quality Director · Verta Sportswear [Illustrative]

Delamination returns −71%

“We run 40 model changeovers a month. Simulating the nest, the mould recipe and the bond window in the twin before the line starts took hours out of every launch.”
Plant Manager · Đông Nam Footwear [Illustrative]

Changeover time −46%

Design-partner scenarios are illustrative and modelled on public footwear-manufacturing benchmarks — named references are [PLACEHOLDER] pending customer approval.

Pricing questions

  • Line at $8,000 per line per month for one workflow, Factory at $55,000 per month for the whole loop, and Enterprise from $350k to $4M ACV for multi-site networks with custom material, last and bond models. Outcome-based components are available on leather waste, rework and returns.

The assessment costs nothing

Two weeks of sensing on one line, a measured baseline, and the run Footeon would have executed. Then decide.